NYHIST-L Archives

April 2007

NYHIST-L@LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Allen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:07:21 EDT
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (551 bytes) , text/html (1294 bytes)
I am also bothered by this phrase, even though I have been known to use  it.  
The problem for writers is that there are not many alternatives.   You can 
ignore the connection between the place and the name on the assumption  that it 
is obvious.  Phrases like "explored the lake that is now named  after him" are 
more awkward.  "Eponymous river" sounds phony.  None of  the choices sound 
very good to me, although I agree that it time to give name  bearing a rest.
 
David Allen



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2