Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - NYHIST-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

NYHIST-L Archives

April 2007

NYHIST-L@LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
NYHIST-L Home NYHIST-L Home
NYHIST-L April 2007

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: "which bears his name"
From:
David Allen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:07:21 EDT
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1175270841"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (551 bytes) , text/html (1294 bytes)
I am also bothered by this phrase, even though I have been known to use  it.  
The problem for writers is that there are not many alternatives.   You can 
ignore the connection between the place and the name on the assumption  that it 
is obvious.  Phrases like "explored the lake that is now named  after him" are 
more awkward.  "Eponymous river" sounds phony.  None of  the choices sound 
very good to me, although I agree that it time to give name  bearing a rest.
 
David Allen



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV