Has anyone noticed that the AG's press release
(http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2008/jan/jan28a_08.html) identifies the recipient of the stolen
Calhoun letter as a "New York General", while the NYTimes story
(http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/29/nyregion/29library.html) identifies the recipient as DeWitt
Clinton secretary Colonel Charles "Haine"? Certainly, the correct identity is Colonel Charles
(Glidden) Haines, yes? It would be unfortunate for the first man who called New York the "Empire
State" to not get his digital age moment in the sun...
Gerard Koeppel