NYHIST-L Archives

February 2008

NYHIST-L@LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Gerard Koeppel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:45:01 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Content-Type:
text/plain
Reply-To:
"A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
Has anyone noticed that the AG's press release 
(http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2008/jan/jan28a_08.html) identifies the recipient of the stolen 
Calhoun letter as a "New York General", while the NYTimes story 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/29/nyregion/29library.html) identifies the recipient as DeWitt 
Clinton secretary Colonel Charles "Haine"? Certainly, the correct identity is Colonel Charles 
(Glidden) Haines, yes? It would be unfortunate for the first man who called New York the "Empire 
State" to not get his digital age moment in the sun...
Gerard Koeppel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2