Has anyone noticed that the AG's press release (http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2008/jan/jan28a_08.html) identifies the recipient of the stolen Calhoun letter as a "New York General", while the NYTimes story (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/29/nyregion/29library.html) identifies the recipient as DeWitt Clinton secretary Colonel Charles "Haine"? Certainly, the correct identity is Colonel Charles (Glidden) Haines, yes? It would be unfortunate for the first man who called New York the "Empire State" to not get his digital age moment in the sun... Gerard Koeppel