Sender: |
"A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State
history." < [log in to unmask]> |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:50:01 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Organization: |
Andrle.com |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
No, wick and kimmelwick are wrong. It is beef on weck or kimmelweck rolls. I
had one just the other day. Check out the web site below for the recipe or
subscribe to the [log in to unmask] mailing list for more
discussion of beef-on-weck and other Buffalo goodies.
http://www.geocities.com/libmary/buffwingsalad.html#Kimmelweck
Chris Andrle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: Beef on weck
> I remember the sandwich, but it was 'beef on wick' or kimmelwick.
> Wayne Miller
>
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Vicki Weiss wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to document a Western New York (especially Buffalo and
vicinity) bar/tavern sandwich: beef on weck or beef on kummelweck. Any leads
would be appreciated, especially anything in writing that pre-dates the
1960s. Thanks.
> >
>
> **************************************************************************
> Wayne L. Miller Special Collections Librarian
> Feinberg Library 2 Draper Avenue
> 518-564-5206 Plattsburgh, NY 12901
> [log in to unmask] or [log in to unmask]
> "I wonder what will happen today!" -Maggie Muggins-
> "Not even God can change history...which is why he tolerates historians."
> -Voltaire
> **************************************************************************
>
|
|
|