NYHIST-L Archives

December 2002

NYHIST-L@LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Daniel Mackay <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Dec 2002 10:13:17 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (907 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
I’ve been pleased to see the discussion of “small city/small town” urban
renewal on the listserv, but I think it is inappropriate to speak of the age
of urban renewal or its implications in the past tense, as communities
throughout New York State continue to make poor decisions regarding
irreplaceable architectural resources in their downtowns.

Catskill, in Greene County, for example, recently lost a full block of
National Register-listed buildings for the construction of a new County
Office complex and parking on Main Street, rather than seeking a better
integrated design. Schenectady continues to lose significant architecture
and Main Street commercial density to block clearing exercises in “new is
better.” While none of this is on the scale of  the classic 1960s urban
renewal  efforts, it is just as appalling to lose the resources to
shortsightedness and the presumption that newer is better.

Daniel Mackay


ATOM RSS1 RSS2