NYHIST-L Archives

September 2001

NYHIST-L@LISTSERV01P.NYSED.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:13:52 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Thanks to all the people who have responded to my posting.  I apologize if
the intensity of my concerns offended people.  I did not at all mean to
express that eyewitness accounts are a less valuable historical source than
other types of documents.  I merely meant to question whether the comparison
to Pearl Harbor would lead us in unfortunate directions (ie internment or use
of nuclear weapons).  I appreciate fully that the comparison may seem as
Clifton Patrick suggested in his thoughtful post "natural and to be
expected."  One of the reasons I always liked history is its ability to
illuminate how some things look natural and others look strange.  We can only
hope that internment and nuclear bombs look as unnatural now as girdles do.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2