NYHIST-L Archives

November 1999

NYHIST-L@LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Thomas W. Perrin" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:38:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
I think that we need to clarify what we mean by clear-cutting. The semantics are
important.

It is one thing to cut all the trees on a plot of land in order to make it suitable
for
agriculture.   This is not clear-cutting. It is, instead, land clearing.

Clear-cutting as a logging word refers to the practice of cutting all standing
timber on a particular plot of land for logging purposes; that is, to sell the
timber. The practice of clear-cutting is usually thought of by traditionalists such
as myself as being conducive to erosion, bad timber management, greedy, and
basically ugly and evil in all its manifestations. Land-clearing for agricultural
purposes, however, has no such connotation.  Paradoxically, traditionalists such as
myself bewail the return of arable lands to forest, and console ourselves only with
the knowledge that we are trading beauty for beauty.  That cannot be said for the
practice of clear-cutting.

Tom Perrin

ATOM RSS1 RSS2