NYHIST-L Archives

April 2001


Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Chris Andrle <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chris Andrle <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:50:01 -0400
text/plain (39 lines)
No, wick and kimmelwick are wrong. It is beef on weck or kimmelweck rolls. I
had one just the other day. Check out the web site below for the recipe or
subscribe to the [log in to unmask] mailing list for more
discussion of beef-on-weck and other Buffalo goodies.


Chris Andrle

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: Beef on weck

> I remember the sandwich, but it was 'beef on wick' or kimmelwick.
> Wayne Miller
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Vicki Weiss wrote:
> > I'm trying to document a Western New York (especially Buffalo and
vicinity) bar/tavern sandwich: beef on weck or beef on kummelweck. Any leads
would be appreciated, especially anything in writing that pre-dates the
1960s. Thanks.
> >
> **************************************************************************
> Wayne L. Miller                         Special Collections Librarian
> Feinberg Library                        2 Draper Avenue
> 518-564-5206                            Plattsburgh, NY 12901
> [log in to unmask]      or             [log in to unmask]
>         "I wonder what will happen today!"  -Maggie Muggins-
> "Not even God can change history...which is why he tolerates historians."
>                                         -Voltaire
> **************************************************************************