I have changed the subject of this thread (previously Townships of
Frugality, Enterprise, etc.) to reflect the new turn this discussion has taken.
I checked some of the legislation authorizing the surveying and sale of
land in central and western New York during the 1780s. I would direct your
attention particularly to "An Act for the Speedy Sale of the Unappropriated
Lands within this State" (Ninth Session, Cap LXVII, May 5, 1786) and "An Act to
Appropriate the Lands Set Apart to the Use of the Troops of the Line of this
State Lately Serving in the Army of the United States" (Twelfth Session,
Chap. 44, Feb. 28, 1789).
Both of these laws refer repeatedly to the creation of "townships," not
towns. This confirms my impression that the term "township" was widely used
at the time to refer to the rectangular blocks of land that were being
surveyed. It also suggest that there was more going on here than the simple
confusion of New York towns with New England townships.
Part of the story, I am sure, has to do with the adoption of the
rectangular survey system by the federal government during these years. The New
York system bears many similarities to the federal system, which can be traced
back in large part to the theories of Thomas Jefferson. As early as 1779,
Jefferson had presented to the Virginia legislature a proposal to "lay off every
county into hundreds of townships of 5. or 6. miles square." (quoted by
Andro Linklater, The Fabric of America, 47). Jefferson was no admirer of New
England, and thought he found a precedent in "Saxon" practice. Behind
Jefferson's proposal there was the widespread protest of farmers in many
colonies/states about the inconvenience and expense of having to travel to do business at
the seats of the huge counties which then existed. This problem certainly
would also have existed in upstate New York, where there were only two or three
counties.
Individuals like George Clinton and Simeon De Witt, who would have
influenced the New York legislation, were very much aware of the theories of
Jefferson and of the federal rectangular survey system, which would have been at
least as important in their thinking as the New England township system.
What actually developed in New York seems to have been the result of a
complex mixture of factors. In most cases, the surveyed "townships" did not
turn into governmental units of any kind (either towns or townships). In
Jefferson's utopian vision, they would have, but the situation in New York caused
things to take a different turn. Some townships (such as Frugality and
Enterprise) existed only on paper. Some surveyed townships indeed became the
basis of towns. The form that the new towns took probably did owe something to
the influence of New England townships, as well as to New York's colonial
system of town government. Demographic and economic patterns frequently
overrode the surveyed township lines in the creation of new towns. Finally, the
creation of smaller counties and improvements in transportation solved many of
the problems that underlay the original call for the creation of townships as
functioning units of government.
At least that is roughly the way it looks to me at the moment. I am no
expert on local government, and doubtless my sketch can be improved. But I
am convinced that the evolution of towns and townships in early New York is
much more complicated and interesting than previously thought. More research
needs to be done on this subject.
David Allen
Encinitas, CA
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
|