Very interesting. It could be that the Hudson River has just had much
more written about it than Lake Champlain. A Google search for "
'Lake Champlain' history book" has only about 263,000 hits, while a search for "
'Hudson River' history book" has about 931,000 hits. Proportionately,
however, based on the Google results, it does appear that writers of Lake
Champlain history have been perhaps more careful than Hudson River writers
to avoid "which bears his name."
Or maybe its an influence from Canada. A Google search for " 'Fraser
River' 'which bears his name' " produced only about 127 hits, while a search for
" 'Fraser River' history book" produces about 135,000 hits. While there
might be far fewer books about the Fraser River than even Lake Champlain, the
use of "which bears his name" for this river seems practically miniscule by
comparison.
In a message dated 4/10/2007 3:16:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
A Google
search for 'hudson river "which bears his name"' shows about 10,200 hits, but
a search for 'lake champlain "which bears his name"' shows only 693
hits!
The similar phase "that bears his name" shows 17,200 hits for
Hudson and only 866 hits for Champlain.
Can we thus conclude that the
phrase is relatively not as hackneyed (so more permissible) for Lake Champlain
as compared to the Hudson River?
Edward
Knoblauch