In a message dated 9/11/2006 1:57:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask] writes:
(Perhaps Mr. Harris is on the list and can answer you in further detail.)
James Nevius' literate and thoughtful post provoked me to write Luther (l[log in to unmask]) who has responded (to the original query, and echoing Nevius' own remarks):

<<<<There's a stronger answer:  hanging by using tree branches, or by any other means than a gallows was against state law and had been so since colonial times.  State law mandated the the local sheriff  pick an appropriate spot and erect a gallows.  State law still governs the means of public executions.

<<<Guide books and sloppy historians (sadly including "Gotham") too often assume that if something could have happened, it did happen, and the elm long had a convenient low branch parallel to the ground  (since removed) that sure looked convenient for the role.>>>

Personally, I am in favor of revoking the law and hanging from trees.  But then I'm kind of a nature guy.  For myself, I'd like a copper beech, please.
 
Christopher Gray
NYC