Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - NYHIST-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

NYHIST-L Archives

November 1999

NYHIST-L@LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
NYHIST-L Home NYHIST-L Home
NYHIST-L November 1999

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: NYS History
From:
[log in to unmask]
Reply To:
A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Nov 1999 13:50:47 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
David:  Since you asked, I'll weigh in on the question of NY as farmland.
Bear in mind these are the observations of an urban historian. It's my
impression that what makes "desirable famland" changes depending on the
farming practices being used.  So, like everything else, "desirable farmland"
is a historically contingent term.   In an article called, "Stone Age New
England: A Geology of Morals," Michael M. Bell argues that New England wasn't
such bad farmland after all.  I can't evaluate his claims as agricultural
history.  Yet, his claim that the myth of the rocky unproductive  soil serves
better to legitimize Manifest Destiny than to describe New England makes
sense.  And besides, I hear they grow pretty good grapes in the Finger Lakes.
 My vegetable garden isn't bad either come to think of it. --Jane Holzka

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV