Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - NYHIST-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

NYHIST-L Archives

July 2006

NYHIST-L@LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
NYHIST-L Home NYHIST-L Home
NYHIST-L July 2006

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Dutch surnames starting with van/Van
From:
NYHISTLED <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:46:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
The following query is posted by request.

--Moderator, NYHIST-L

* * * * 

I'm going over a book manuscript on colonial New York with my
copyeditor who
queries me on whether the "van" so common among 17th and 18th century
names
should be capitalized or not. When reading early sources the
capitalization
is variable, and the print versions by 19th and 20th century historians
seem
to vary, too.  I had decided to leave all my van Rensselaers, etc,
lower-case for consistency's sake.  Is there an accepted practice, or
is the
capitalization of "van" ("Van"?!) optional?

 

Best,

Sara Gronim
[log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV