NYHIST-L Archives

August 1999

NYHIST-L@LISTSERV.NYSED.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hal Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
A LISTSERV list for discussions pertaining to New York State history." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Aug 1999 10:35:35 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (30 lines)
I don't think David made *that* mistake, if only because 43M is a lot more
than the population of the U.S. at the time, and most of them were never
in New York state anyway.

A mental calculation says that's about 120,000 or 130,000 per day on
average, which was a lot of moving around in those days.

Hal Morris: [log in to unmask]   --  Editor of:
* H-SHEAR Web pages: http://www.h-net.msu.edu/~shear
* Tales of the Early Republic: http://www.panix.com/~hal
  Web Resources:  Bibliography, Biographical Dict... (work in progress)
* Jacksonian Miscellanies: free email weekly of source excerpts.

On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, Shirley wrote:

> Transit agencies count each passenger boarding, so the figure represents that.
> It doesn't mean that 43M+ individuals rode their conveyances.  That's why the
> figure appears so misleading.
>
> David Minor wrote:
> >
> > York Staters,
> >
> > According to French's Gazetteer of 1860 in the fiscal year ending
> > September 30, 1858, New York State trains had carried 43,786,579
> > passengers. If I'm reading the report correctly, that's a lot of
> > people. Does anyone else have any thoughts on the accuracy of that
> > count?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2